Skip to main content

Sample Essay On "In Praise of Idleness" (For My Students)

According to a popular saying, “idle hands do the devil’s work.” What does this saying mean, and does the author of “In Praise of Ideleness” agree with this saying? Summarize and evaluate his argument.

The saying, “idle hands do the devil’s work,” means that if you aren’t doing any work (have “idle hands”), you are actually “working” for the devil. In other words, if you don’t have any work to do, you will spend your time doing bad things. The idea behind the saying is that work is good, and good people are always working. Russell does not agree with this saying. In his essay, “In Praise of Idleness,” he first defines work and then explains why, according to his definition, work is not a good thing. Finally, he imagines how the world might be better if there were less work. In this essay, I will explain what he thinks about work, and then I will give my opinion.
         According to Russell, work is basically moving things from one place to another. For example, building a house would be work, because to build a house, we have to move bricks, wood, and so on. In comparison, studying would not be as much work, because we only have to turn the pages of a book or move a pen on a piece of paper. Based on this definition, we can see why there is nothing good about work. We don’t like to move things unless we need to. We might build a house because we need somewhere to live – but there’s no reason to build a house if we don’t need somewhere to live. Moving things when you do not need to just makes you tired and annoyed.
         Russell believes that as technology becomes more and more advanced, we need to do less and less work. In the past, before we had machines, we had to do work very hard in order to get what we need to live. Today, machines have made our lives much easier – we can get most of the things we need without working very hard. This should have made us happier. However, because of our economy, we still need to work to make money. As new machines are invented, many of us lose our jobs. In the end, some of us still have to work just as hard, while others have no job or money.
Russell thinks we should find a better way. He says that if everyone worked four hours a day, we would be able to produce all the things we need. But we would also have more free time. More free time and less work means we would have more time and energy for our hobbies. This would make everyone happier.
I agree with Russell. We would be happier if we worked less. But I don’t think it will be easy to make this happen. Because of our economy and our society, we will always need to work to make money. Also, if we did not work hard every day, we might become lazy. During summer break, I have no job, but I do not paint or write or dance. Instead, I just spend all day on my computer. Sometimes, I find I work hardest when I’m busiest: it is because I have so little free time that I value my free time so much.

In conclusion, Russell’s idea is interesting, but I do not think it is realistic.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Sample Essay On Shakespeare's Fifth Sonnet (For My Students)

The theme of Shakespeare’s 5 th Sonnet is saving time. In the poem, Shakespeare talks about how time makes beautiful things ugly. He compares growing old to the way that summer changes into winter. Though in the summer there are many beautiful flowers, in the winter all of these beautiful flowers are gone and there is “bareness every where” (8). The winter is so empty that we could almost forget there had ever been flowers at all – if we didn’t “distil” (13) the beauty of summer to make perfume. What Shakespeare means is that we need to find a way to remember being young (the summer) so that when we are older (in winter) we will still be able to remember being happy. We could do this by having children, who will look like us and make us remember who we were when we were young. I just explained the theme of Shakespeare’s poem and summarized the poem. Now I will talk about how he communicates his theme. First, Shakespeare uses metonymy to help us understand how beautiful we ar...

Genre -- In General

I've spent a bit of time recently watching YouTube videos related to the question of what makes something an RPG.  Since studying literary theory in college, I've become skeptical that you can give clean-cut definitions of the various genres.  I think two works belong to the same genre if they are similar enough across various dimensions.  The problem with similarity is that it's vague.  Everything is similar to everything else in some way, just on a general metaphysical level, and once you get to the products of human culture, each of them is much more like each of the others than it is different.  So arguments about genre tend to fixate on arbitrarily selected differences the importance of which are then magnified to the level of dogma. I believe there is no one difference that will always make X a member of genre G rather than genre G'.  The products of culture are descriptively rich, and there are any number of relevant features that make our experien...

An Empty Gesture

He finds that with propriety he cannot write about his own life.  He acts against people, but he would not make those people conscious witnesses of his actions.  He seals himself away from others, both by the barriers he places in their way and by the silence he erects to guard those barriers.  It is the assault of an animal -- the very thought is contained in the action, and the thought is nothing besides, or at least has no other expression than, that action. To the departed: it was a matter of drifting, it was a matter of harm.  The harm became a wound, the wound scarred, the scar is a rift.  I think of it like a gap that fills up with all the hostilities of the world.  It is something radical and diseased, and I want no part of it.  I also would like to be someone else.  There is now what is for me an insurmountable investment of pain required to cross it, so I would rather call it a loss.  But I feel the pain enough to remark it. ...