Skip to main content

Genre -- In General

I've spent a bit of time recently watching YouTube videos related to the question of what makes something an RPG.  Since studying literary theory in college, I've become skeptical that you can give clean-cut definitions of the various genres.  I think two works belong to the same genre if they are similar enough across various dimensions.  The problem with similarity is that it's vague.  Everything is similar to everything else in some way, just on a general metaphysical level, and once you get to the products of human culture, each of them is much more like each of the others than it is different.  So arguments about genre tend to fixate on arbitrarily selected differences the importance of which are then magnified to the level of dogma.

I believe there is no one difference that will always make X a member of genre G rather than genre G'.  The products of culture are descriptively rich, and there are any number of relevant features that make our experience of each one memorable, so that when another cultural product reminds us enough of the features that we most appreciated in X, we naturally group the two together.  To belong to a genre is to participate in a network of resemblances.  At the same time, because these resemblances are a matter of the impressions that cultural products make on us, judgments about genre become, to a certain extent, idiosyncratic or subjective.

Because similarity is vague, because similarity rests as much on the connections we individually draw when we engage with a product of culture as its objective qualities and relations (if indeed it has any), the truth of the judgment that X and Y belong to the same genre becomes vague.  This is a judgment we can on the one hand support with reasons by appealing to qualities that are objectively present in the work -- but which, on the other hand, depends upon the subjective weight we each (whether consciously or unconsciously) assign to those various qualities based on our own experience with the genre -- based on what we have found most memorable through the course of a lifetime of engagement.

The only reason that we agree as much as we do on what does and does not belong to a given genre is because of the constraints that our common nature places on our individual experience.  It's only because our subjective experiences are for the most part so similar that we for the most part agree on the genre to assign to a given cultural product.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Sample Essay On Shakespeare's Fifth Sonnet (For My Students)

The theme of Shakespeare’s 5 th Sonnet is saving time. In the poem, Shakespeare talks about how time makes beautiful things ugly. He compares growing old to the way that summer changes into winter. Though in the summer there are many beautiful flowers, in the winter all of these beautiful flowers are gone and there is “bareness every where” (8). The winter is so empty that we could almost forget there had ever been flowers at all – if we didn’t “distil” (13) the beauty of summer to make perfume. What Shakespeare means is that we need to find a way to remember being young (the summer) so that when we are older (in winter) we will still be able to remember being happy. We could do this by having children, who will look like us and make us remember who we were when we were young. I just explained the theme of Shakespeare’s poem and summarized the poem. Now I will talk about how he communicates his theme. First, Shakespeare uses metonymy to help us understand how beautiful we ar...
Post a Comment
Read more

To Witness That Such Things As Monuments Are Possible (Saying "Hello")

It's been such a long time since I've written anything.  That phrase ought never to be used in the first line of a composition -- as a matter both of ethics and of style.  But if I'm to begin again at all, I have to begin with the first thought that strikes me, and given what I am beginning, the first thought that strikes me is that. I am clearing my throat before I speak or testing out my voice.  It was much the same thing to say to myself again and again "Hello" when I was young -- just to assure myself that I could speak.  It is honesty, anyway, and it is a true record.  But wouldn't it be odd to come across the memorial of a man, each of whose entries began, "It has been such a long time since I have remembered...?"  This is meditation in the way that I know it -- repeatedly catching oneself.  This awareness comes and goes in waves -- in waves, perhaps, it builds into something deeper.  Or else it just subsides and reappears.  But that is...
Post a Comment
Read more

On Teaching

A bit frustrated recently applying for jobs back in the US.  I could be applying to more jobs and following up more vigorously, but the rejections wear you down after awhile. It's a crash course in Stoicism. Here are some of the questions I've had to field as I've applied for teaching jobs: Why do you want to teach in a Catholic school? How would you address a wide range of skills in the classroom? What do you think causes students to fall behind academically? What helps them succeed? How would you address the diverse set of student and family needs that you are likely to face? How have you demonstrated a commitment to urban education? How would you communicate a sense of urgency in your classroom? Describe a time when you demonstrated a "whatever it takes" mindset. They're reasonable enough questions in themselves, I'll admit. But I constantly have the feeling of having to jump through hoops. I know that people have in mind a certain ideal; I ...
Post a Comment
Read more